Re: Patch for supporting TYPE=USER for PPG

Stipe Tolj wrote:
> BTW, I'd like to avoid a single config directive for ALL substritute rules. I
> know we have this "mechanism" of a sort of "list" in the config processing, but
> this get's horror to read in the end if you have, let's say, 30 rules or something.
>
> Can't we think a bit to have "multi-directives" with the same name in a group?
>
> Obviously we would have to tweak the gwlib/cfg.[ch] here ;)
>   
I think this is an architecture issue, and I leave it to you in deep 
respect :-)

If we have "multi-directives", I'd be lucky to use them...


Cheers,


Georg