Re: scalability of kannel
Djiby SY <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanos Chatziathanassiou wrote : > Andreas Fink wrote: >>> You can run as many SMS boxes and WAP boxes as you want on different >>> machines sharing the load of one bearerbox's traffic. >>> That's ok. >>> >>> >Besides that, you can also pile multiple bearerbox/smsbox >>> applications in parallel >>> what is the interest to have more than one bearerbox in the same >>> machine ? >> >> none. You would run multiple bearerboxes on different machines >> connecting to the same smsc for example. every one would handle the >> same keywords in parallel. >> >>> Is it possible to connect two bearerbox installed in two different >>> machines to the same smsc with the same account ? for fault tolerance. >> >> Depends a bit on the SMSC but basically yes. >> in terms of MO processing this is no problem. Incoming SMS can be >> handled by either bearerbox/smsbox bundle as long as the configs are >> the same. >> in terms of MT processing, there should be two different accounts as >> the SMSC might return a delivery report to the wrong machine >> otherwise. By using a different account, you make sure the delivery >> report gets to the same machine who submitted it. > ..or you can have shared dlr storage (as in a database) and work > around that. > but basically, if you want HA and load balancing, you'll want shared > dlr storage anyhow. >> >> >> >> >> Andreas Fink >> >> Fink Consulting GmbH >> Global Networks Schweiz AG >> BebbiCell AG >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> Tel: +41-61-6666330 Fax: +41-61-6666331 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 >> Address: Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland >> E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> www.finkconsulting.com www.global-networks.ch www.bebbicell >> <http://www.bebbicell>.ch >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> ICQ: 8239353 MSN: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> AIM: smsrelay >> Skype: andreasfink >> Yahoo: finkconsulting SMS: +41792457333 >> >> >> >> >> > > />..or you can have shared dlr storage (as in a database) and work around that. >but basically, if you want HA and load balancing, you'll want shared dlr storage anyhow./ What does HA mean? Is it possible to make load balancing with bearerbox? -- Djiby