Re: Bug at smsc_smpp.c for receive_port ??

Hi Juan, thank you very much for you answer.

I need to set two binds, one for TX and one for RX.

What I am doing is creating one smsc "smsc1_tx" setting the
receive-port = 0 (disable) and the port = 5321. And other one,
"smsc1_rx" with receive-port = 5321 and port = 0 (disable).

What I am trying to do is one bind for RX and one for TX.

What I am getting is:

smsc1_rx connected like 5321/0 (port 5321for TX and 0 for RX)
smsc1_tx connected like 5321/5321 (port 5321 for TX and RX)

After looking at the code I realize that the kannel is seeing -no-
receive-port, so setting it to port´s port.
I tried with the transceiver-mode = false, but no difference

Thanks
Regards



Emiliano


On 5/1/07, Juan Nin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Emiliano Darriba wrote:
> > Hi, I am trying to set receive-port = 0, but I keeps connecting on
> > port´s "port"After checking the smsc_smpp.c code, I have found this
> > line:
> >
> > conn->name = octstr_format("SMPP:%S:%d/%d:%S:%S",
> >                             host, port,
> >                             (receive_port ? receive_port : port),
> >                             username, system_type);
> >
> >
> > Line 2136: "(receive_port ? receive_port : port)"
> > As receive_port is zero, the condition is FALSE and then it falls to
> > port, so, if the receive_port is set to zero or none set, it always
> > falls to port.
> >
> > May be I am missing something, but as I can not set the receive port
> > to zero, I thought this could be the problem.
> > I may be wrong because I saw conf examples with two binds, one for RX
> > and one for TX, and no problems reported...
> >
> > Please answer
> > Regards
> >
> >
> Emiliano, I'm not sure I undesrtand you post...
>
> Value "0" has the effect of disabling it, therefore only using "port"
> from the userguide:
>
> receive-port    port-number     The port number for the RECEIVER connection
> to the SMSC. May be the same as port. Use value 0 to disable this I/O
> thread.
>
>
>
>  From your post I believe you mean you really want to set "0" as
> receive_port???
> Port 0 does not exist!!! You can not set a port with value 0!!!
>
> Was that what you wanted??
>
> Regards,
>
> Juan
>
>