Re: [PATCH] multipart mime output

Hi,

I think your patch is OK, any objections from others? 

P. A. Bagyenda wrote:

> Hi,
>     Is there any good reason why we add an extra CRLF to the end of
> a message part? The patch attached proposes to reverse this, as it
> seems to expand the message size each time we go from mime -> octstr -
>  > mime. Any objections?
> 
> P.

-- 
Thanks,
Alex