Re: [PATCH] SQLBox against latest CVS

Reflejo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Fw to list.

On 10/5/07, Reflejo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Actually... the last version is the stand-alone one. If you cat CHANGES of
> sqlbox cvs head you'll see. Last change was made in.. 2006/06/20
>
> I'm not documenting every change in sqlbox-standalone mainly because i
> forget it. :)
>
> (BTW +1 to your last patch. I'll include it ASAP)
>
> M.
>
> On 10/5/07, Alejandro Guerrieri < [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Martín,
> >
> > I've tried it, great work! In fact I'm using the standalone version on
> > all many of our production servers with no issues whatsoever, but I've
> > noticed that there are many things that differ between the standalone
> > and the patch. Since the test I've been running didn't succeed with
> > the standalone, I've took a chance and tried to compile the patch.
> > There I've noticed the problem with CVS.
> >
> > BTW, the differences between the standalone and the patch, besides the
> > obviously related to the fact that it's an independent beast, are
> > because the code on the standalone is older? Any chances of updating
> > it to the latest codebase?
> >
> > Better yet, any chances of making the standalone the "defacto" sqlbox
> > and merging it on the main tree? It's quite more practical than
> > patching the code again and again.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Alejandro
> >
> > On 10/5/07, Reflejo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Maybe you should use stand-alone version. ;)
> > >
> > > http://www.kannel.org/~mconte/sqlbox/<http://www.kannel.org/%7Emconte/sqlbox/>
> > >
> > > Martin Conte
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/3/07, Alejandro Guerrieri < [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > I've been trying yo compile sqlbox against latest CVS, and the
> > patches
> > > > doesn't apply.
> > > >
> > > > I've fixed it, here is the patch:
> > > >
> > > > Index: sqlbox.patch
> > > >
> > > ===================================================================
> > > > RCS file: /home/cvs/sqlbox/sqlbox.patch,v
> > > > retrieving revision 1.5
> > > > diff -u -r1.5 sqlbox.patch
> > > > --- sqlbox.patch        13 Jun 2006 22:52:45 -0000       1.5
> > > > +++ sqlbox.patch        3 Oct 2007 13:27:23 -0000
> > > > @@ -412,15 +412,15 @@
> > > > diff -u - r1.266 smsbox.c
> > > > --- gw/smsbox.c 15 May 2006 18:24:40 -0000  1.266
> > > > +++ gw/smsbox.c 30 May 2006 17:44:18 -0000
> > > > -@@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@
> > > > +@@ -3308,7 +3308,7 @@
> > > >       Octstr *http_proxy_password = NULL;
> > > >       Octstr *http_proxy_exceptions_regex = NULL;
> > > >       int ssl = 0;
> > > > -    int lf, m;
> > > > +    int lf, m, bearerbox_is_sqlbox = 0;
> > > > +     long max_req;
> > > >
> > > > -     bb_port = BB_DEFAULT_SMSBOX_PORT;
> > > > -     bb_ssl = 0;
> > > > +    bb_port = BB_DEFAULT_SMSBOX_PORT;
> > > > @@ -3365,6 +3365,18 @@
> > > >       if (grp == NULL)
> > > >      panic(0, "No 'smsbox' group in configuration");
> > > > @@ -452,9 +452,9 @@
> > > >       OCTSTR(smsbox-id)
> > > >       OCTSTR(bearerbox-host)
> > > > +    OCTSTR(bearerbox-is-sqlbox)
> > > > +     OCTSTR(bearerbox-port)
> > > > +     OCTSTR(bearerbox-port-ssl)
> > > >       OCTSTR(sendsms-port)
> > > > -     OCTSTR(sendsms-port-ssl)
> > > > -     OCTSTR(sendsms-interface)
> > > > @@ -556,6 +557,27 @@
> > > >       OCTSTR(unified-prefix)
> > > >   )
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Alejandro
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Alejandro Guerrieri
> > > > Magicom
> > > > http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
> > > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alejandro Guerrieri
> > Magicom
> > http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri
> >
> >
>


-- 
Martín Conte Mac Donell
http://www.catartico.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.