Re: [PATCH] Include milliseconds in logging
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | tolj.org system architecture |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Vincent CHAVANIS schrieb:
> ok,
>
> You want just be more "flexible" but
> i don't see here a real need to be flexible on this.
> Even with ssl, localtime, keepalive, mutex, cookies options
> (you are growing unecesserarily the data segment)
>
> Then, in term of performances,
> you will have the same result as a macro.
??? ... now the relation is easy:
macro way -> same performance, minor flexibility
function pointer -> same performance, more flexibilty
from the user perspective way 2 is ALWAYS preferred. Isn't it?
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------