Re: [PATCH] Include milliseconds in logging

ok,

will try to provide something soon.

Vincent.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>
To: "Vincent CHAVANIS" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Include milliseconds in logging


> Vincent CHAVANIS schrieb:
>> ok,
>>
>> You want just be more "flexible" but
>> i don't see here a real need to be flexible on this.
>> Even with ssl, localtime, keepalive, mutex, cookies options
>> (you are growing unecesserarily the data segment)
>>
>> Then, in term of performances,
>> you will have the same result as a macro.
>
> ??? ... now the relation is easy:
>
> macro way -> same performance, minor flexibility
> function pointer -> same performance, more flexibilty
>
> from the user perspective way 2 is ALWAYS preferred. Isn't it?
>
> Stipe
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kölner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>