Re: [PATCH] empty msg->sms.sender support

Specs 4.6 says that these fileds (oadc, adc) are only mendatory.
IMO, NULL or empty will result in writing the same way the request.

Vincent.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] empty msg->sms.sender support


> Andreas Fink schrieb:
>>
>> EMI/UCP supports missing sender address in operation 01 but I dont think 
>> it does it in operation 51
>
> yep, the specs are a bit unclear for EMI/UCP. How about converting the 
> msg->sms.sender = NULL in this case into an "" (emptry string) and pass it 
> as "empty alphanumeric OAdC?
>
> Stipe
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kölner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>