Re: [PATCH] empty msg->sms.sender support

On 02.02.2008, at 13:17, Stipe Tolj wrote:

> Andreas Fink schrieb:
>> the only way to have it empty is to use an operation 01 instead of  
>> 51...
>
> is that transparently?
>

This is definitively true for  CMG's SMSC's.

> Which means we check within gw/smsc/smsc_emi.c if we have source  
> addr, if we have use UCP 51, if not (hence empty) use UCP 01. With  
> the same "rest" of the data?

The packet format is different for 01 than 51. There are less fields.  
But not that much different.