Re: [PATCH] empty msg->sms.sender support

Hi,

I don't think it's worth the effort to implement NULL source address because
most protocols just don't allow empty source address and many places in
kannel expect source addr not NULL. 

Stipe Tolj wrote:

> Vincent CHAVANIS schrieb:
>> Yep,
>> 
>> But UCP 01 is stated as legacy operation.
>> And should be remove in the future version of the UCP protocol.
>> This has been keeped for backward compatibility.
> 
> hmmm... so we don't have a chance to map the "empty source addr" issue to
> some valid UCP 51 operation?
> 
> We could do some "all nasty all we should not do it" approach and simply
> send "0" as numeric source addr? ;)
> 
> Stipe
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kölner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 DÃŒsseldorf, NRW, Germany
> 
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
> 
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Thanks,
Alex