RE: PATCH: only typedef int64 if type does not already exist

> Bostock James schrieb:
> >
> > Fair enough.
> >
> > How about instead of using the name int64, using a name less likely
to
> > conflict with a name defined by the OS. Say, gw_int64?
> 
> now, what I don't understand is: why doesn't the OS layer headers map
> transparently for any upper layer application (Kannel)?
> 
> The linux-x86_64, along macosx, [free|open|ned]bsd seem to do.

I am not sure what you mean by "map transparently".

AIX 5.2 typedefs int64 in /usr/include/inttypes.h. This causes the
compilation of smsc_soap.c to fail.

-james