Re: FW: Does kannel maintain multiple qeue for each user conected

"Ken Bellars" <ken.bellars 'at' gmail.com> writes:

> If priority does not currently exist within Kannel, then it will be
> good if we can have such a patch.

For displaying application metadata about messages, I find it
easier to maintain a queue on the application side; e.g. I
regularly query the queue value of Kannel, and if it is over a
configured amount, I queue on the application side. The
interesting side effect is that I'm already able to implement
priorities, with any particularities I see fit, potentially
including dynamic priorities; and I'm also able to automatically
cancel too long delayed messages easily in my queue on metadata
basis too.

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau