RE: [PATCH] Re: MySQL storage engine
"Mathieu Bruneau" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I do agree on this because it actually become your single-point of failure :) In this case, I was thinking about sending it toward a db that has redundancy built into it. It's merely less thing to take care. (I suppose that most ppl have HA/redundancy built into their DB nodes) ------- Mathieu Bruneau -----Original Message----- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 7:26 AM To: Mathieu Bruneau Cc: Alejandro Guerrieri; [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: MySQL storage engine Mathieu Bruneau schrieb: > Hi, > I haven't tried it but if that works well that's surely a feature I > would like to see available... That would ease our issue of having a > file (or folder) replicated to a standby node thus helping toward > having a better availability system. now, solving "replication" of standby data on the file system shouldn't be done by kludging it via a central mysql server ;) For replication of the storage subsystem (file or spool dir) you should consider using DRBD http://www.drbd.org/ or an other kernel layer distributed file system. Stipe -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------