RE: How kannel creates "cgi-bin" program to handle "http" requests
"Eds Encarnacion" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | EDSAVENUE |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If I may suggest... Why not keep the current /cgi-bin/sendsms for a few more release versions, but specify how many releases it will be kept in place before it will be ditched completely? I'm assuming that there are a lot of us novice users that didn't code things properly at the onset that would need some time to transition. Eds. -----Original Message----- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:44 AM Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: How kannel creates "cgi-bin" program to handle "http" requests Andreas Fink schrieb: > Why change a running horse? > > I can understand we can announce "breaking changes" in the NEWS. > But there has to be a good reason for a change. like chaning from latin1 > to utf8 which make's certain things no longer break. > but changing the name of the /cgi-bin/sendsms string to /whatever for me > is breaking something which works for absolutely no benefit. which translates as a vote either -1 (veto) or -0 (not really neeed, but not vetoing) ? ;) Stipe ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------