Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, there is deferred filed in kannel Msg struct, that could be used for this... Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb: > I think that having scheduling capabilities would be cool, but I > definitely do not agree with using the time column, since that column is > used internally on Kannel and cannot be tweaked without disrupting other > stuff. > > I think this needs further thinking, though. There are performance > considerations to take into account for example (when you have lots of > messages queued, adding a condition on the select can impact performance > if it's not done right). > > Regards, > > Alejandro Guerrieri > > El 18/11/2008, a las 12:36 p.m., Ehizogie Binitie escribió: > >> Hi Alex >> What are your thoughts on converting the timestamp on the sqlbox field >> into a basic scheduler. >> >> So messages are delivered if system time greater = or > msg time stamp? >> >> Ehi >> >> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:15 -0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: >>> Ken, >>> >>> I've used SqlBox to handle 200-300K messages per day for months with >>> no issues using commodity hardware (P IV 3.0 Ghz with 1 Gig RAM) and >>> using the same box for kannel, sqlbox and MySQL. The traffic was >>> unevenly distributed across the day, with day hours receiving almost >>> all traffic. >>> >>> I think Sqlbox can handle that load on decent hardware. You'll have to >>> take into account other factors though, specially on the application's >>> side, as well as the SMPP traffic to your carrier. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>> >>> El 18/11/2008, a las 09:46 a.m., Ken Bellars escribió: >>> >>>> Hi Alejandro, >>>> >>>> Your contributions are highly appreciated. >>>> >>>> Am about to use SQLbox for a production system for delivering 5million >>>> sms/monthly. please can SQLbox handle this seamlessly? >>>> >>>> I anticipate your early reply. >>>> >>>> On 11/18/08, Alejandro Guerrieri <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I've just commited a new SqlBox version. Changes on this version are: >>>>> >>>>> - Added support for the LibSDB database abstraction library. DB >>>>> support is now similar to Kannel's. >>>>> - Extensive code reorganization to move the queries into the header >>>>> files and allow reusing from the libsdb module. >>>>> - Added examples for database connections on sample conf file. >>>>> >>>>> I've also started a numbering schema and I'm also tagging relevant >>>>> versions. >>>>> >>>>> Cvs version 20081103 is now tagged as rev-0-6-0 and represents >>>>> Sqlbox-0.6.0. >>>>> Cvs version 20081113 is now tagged as rev-0-7-0. >>>>> Cvs version 20081118 is now tagged as rev-0.7.1 (This is the latest >>>>> release). >>>>> >>>>> As usual, you can checkout latest version from CVS, and also retrieve >>>>> tagged versions as follow: >>>>> >>>>> cvs co -r rev-0-6-0 (to retrieve version 0.6.0, for example). >>>>> >>>>> You can also download this and former releases from here: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.kannel.org/~aguerrieri/ >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Kenny >>>> >>>> >>>> "Whosoever desires constant success must change his conduct with the >>>> times."-Niccolo Machiavelli >>> >>> >> >> > > >