RE: Next stable Kannel version soon?

"Eds Encarnacion" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Organization EDSAVENUE
Message-ID <[email protected]>
IMHO, it would be great to have the meta-data and DLR patches committed once
they are deemed stable.  The product would be more robust and would (more
likely) address the needs of the open-source users that do not delve into
the dev side of the product.  

I've met a number of people/companies that decided to create their own
gateways because of some features that aren't available on the
production/stable version of Kannel.  

I've only been looking through the dev side of Kannel for a few months now,
but I've been using the product since 2002.  It's easier to justify to
management to use stable releases of an open-source product rather than to
justify the use of a dev version with patches.  IMO, it's a psychological
thing, but it's a reality that most dev teams need to live with.

I haven't had a problem with the new meta-data and DLR patches.  If everyone
else thinks it's good, I think it should be committed.

Eds.




-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Bellars [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 4:47 PM
To: Nikos Balkanas; Alejandro Guerrieri; Ankur Bhatnagar; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Next stable Kannel version soon?

Hi,

The last stable version is about 2yrs or older. Development is ongoin,
and will always be.

I agree with Alejandro, as soon as all meta-data and dlr patches are
commited, then its time.

On 12/2/08, Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> wrote:
> The operative word here is "floating". When it is ripe for picking you
will
> know.
>
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" <[email protected]>
> To: "Ankur Bhatnagar" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "'Nikos Balkanas'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 6:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Next stable Kannel version soon?
>
>
> IMHO once the meta-data and other patches floating around are voted
> and commited.
>
> The code on CVS has been production-quality for a lot of time, and
> there's a lot of improvements on CVS already.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Alejandro Guerrieri
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> El 02/12/2008, a las 02:38 a.m., Ankur Bhatnagar escribiσ:
>
>> When do you think would be a good time -- a month, three months, or
more?
>>
>> Regards, Ankur
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 8:26 PM
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Next stable Kannel version soon?
>>
>> This is not a good time. I think a better opportunity would be when
>> patches
>> and development have quiet down.
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ken Bellars" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 1:40 PM
>> Subject: Next stable Kannel version soon?
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The development work on Kannel has been wonderful recently. So many
>>> good patches are now available on the CVS.
>>>
>>> IMO i think we should have another stable version that will include
>>> all the recent development work soon.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Kenny
>>>
>>>
>>> "Whosoever desires constant success must change his conduct with the
>>> times."-Niccolo Machiavelli
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Kenny


"Whosoever desires constant success must change his conduct with the
times."-Niccolo Machiavelli
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.