Re: SQLBox not compatible with smppbox version cvs 20081222

"Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <001401c965b0$43ba6bb0$02b2a8c0@tardis>
Please use "users" list. This list is used specifically when addressing specific code fragments. 
Not to worry, all devel members are in users as well.

BR,
Nikos
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Farida N. Bedwei 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:50 AM
  Subject: SQLBox not compatible with smppbox version cvs 20081222


  Hi,

   

  I pulled from CVS the latest version of SQLBox and kannel and run it with smppbox version 20081222.  Although all boxes start up correctly, when I attempt to send a message via smppbox, sqlbox shuts down with the error below:

   

   

  2008-12-23 13:57:11 [307] [7] INFO: Connected to bearerbox at localhost port 13001.

  2008-12-23 13:57:11 [307] [7] DEBUG: Started thread 8

  (sqlbox.c:bearerbox_to_smsbox)

  2008-12-23 13:57:11 [307] [7] DEBUG: smsbox_to_bearerbox: got boxc_id <KSMSC> from <127.0.0.1>

  2008-12-23 13:57:11 [307] [8] DEBUG: Thread 8

  (sqlbox.c:bearerbox_to_smsbox) maps to pid 307.

  2008-12-23 13:57:19 [307] [7] ERROR: Msg packet was invalid.

  2008-12-23 13:57:19 [307] [7] ERROR: Failed to unpack data!

  2008-12-23 13:57:20 [307] [0] DEBUG: Thread 2 (sqlbox.c:bearerbox_to_sql) still running

  2008-12-23 13:57:20 [307] [0] DEBUG: Thread 7 (sqlbox.c:function) still running

  2008-12-23 13:57:20 [307] [0] DEBUG: Thread 8

  (sqlbox.c:bearerbox_to_smsbox) still running

  2008-12-23 13:57:20 [307] [0] DEBUG: Immutable octet strings: 54.

   

  Is there a patch available which addresses this problem?

   

  Regards,

   

   

  Farida N. Bedwei

   

  Senior Software Architect

  Rancard Solutions Ltd.

  web: www.rancardmobility.com

  mobile: +233.24.425.5654 / +233.207.984.347

  office: +233.289.529.573
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.