Re: Stable release 1.4.2 won't run on 64 bit

Hi,

could you please run:

addr2line -e /path/to/64bit/compiled/bearerbox 0x448c31 0x449348 
0x44a49b 0x4968b9

Thanks,
Alex

Hillel schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> It's great to have the mailing list active again and congratulation on
> stable release 1.4.2.
> We usually use the CVS but since its been down, we installed release 1.4.2.
> 
> Using cvs-20081214, kannel works fine using x64 with the latest Centos
> (Redhat Linux Enterprise clone) without needing to use any extra
> configuration parameters.
> 
> With the latest stable release 1.4.2, Kannel compiles fine, but the
> bearerbox crashes.
> We also tried to add to configure:  
>    CFLAGS= -m64  ./configure --with-pgsql --enable-start-stop-daemon
> --enable-ssl --enable-localtime --enable-cookies
> However the bearerbox still does not start.
> 
> If we run /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox -v 1 /etc/kannel.conf
> 
> We get the following error before the bearerbox crashes.
> 
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [0] INFO: MAIN: Start-up done, entering mainloop
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC: octstr_format format string syntax
> error.
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC:
> /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox(gw_panic+0x24e) [0x4a1db3]
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox [0x4a9db5]
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC:
> /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox(octstr_format_valist_real+0x13d) [0x4aa0be]
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC:
> /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox(octstr_format+0xdc) [0x4a9f69]
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox [0x448c31]
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox [0x449348]
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox [0x44a49b]
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox [0x4968b9]
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC: /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> [0x2aaaab7d12f7]
> 2009-01-20 23:01:11 [24006] [9] PANIC: /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)
> [0x2aaaac13ce3d]
> 
> Has anyone succeeded in running the stable release 1.4.2 or the latest CVS
> with 64 bit Centos or Redhat Enterprise?
> 
> Wishing you all a wonderful 2009.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
>