Re: [PATCH] Location header recovering to absoluteURI

There is no problem with the list. I got both of your mails OK. Additionally 
you obviously receive list messages.

BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Conte Mac Donell" <[email protected]>
To: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>
Cc: "kannel_dev_mailinglist" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Location header recovering to absoluteURI


>I think this email doesn't arrive to the list. here we go again:
>
> I'm just visiting here since i've got an insanely amount of work, but
> i'v two comments.
>
> 1) Eclipse?, really?
>
> 2) I'm not pretty sure about "if (trans->port != 80)", it'll work fine
> in most cases but there is a border case when it'll not (Yeah, i know.
> I'm anal), the case is when you are going through ssl by port 80 (Yeah
> ok, shouldn't happen but you never know). I think the safest way is
> append port number always, it won't hurt anyway.
>
> M.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Martin Conte Mac Donell
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> we refuse to follow party defined absoluteURI Location header values. 
>>> Which is
>>> "correct" when being pedantic with the specs. But some mayor HTTP 
>>> services, i.e.
>>> Yahoo do send URI /xxx as Location header values. This patch ensures we 
>>> are able
>>> to recover from this circumstance, and continue the following.
>>>
>>> Please review, test and vote for committing to CVS HEAD.
>>>
>>> Stipe
>