Re: [PATCH] Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), direction dated 2008-12-10
Alejandro Guerrieri <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Agreeing with Alex as well. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 26/02/2009, at 12:14, Kenny wrote: > Hi, > > I support Alex because this can easily be resolved at the application > level. Several countries may as well have other requirments and would > this mean having patches for all the countries? > > > On 2/26/09, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> distro packages have nothing todo with this hack. >> >> Kannel has following rule: >> no specific workarounds (and this hack is only India specific and is >> only for commercial MT) >> >> If we break this rule we have to do more work to allow all the needed >> workarounds and maintain these, >> what is the real work. >> >> The second think about this patch: why should this go into SMPP >> module? why it's not possible to do >> at application level before submitting message to kannel? I really >> don't see reason to accept this patch. >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> Am 26.02.2009 um 08:09 schrieb Enver ALTIN: >> >>> Hi Stipe, >>> >>> At first glance, my reaction was neutral like you but then I think >>> somehow it needs to go in. >>> >>> A comfortable Kannel experience today is to download the source code >>> from CVS, build and use that. This was how a Slackware or Gentoo >>> user >>> would get things done nearly a decade ago, but things change. >>> >>> There are excellent distributions like Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora and >>> SuSE; >>> and that's what people actually use. If there is a Kannel package >>> provided by their distribution of choice, they use that. >>> >>> Now, think about people from India. You're really putting a >>> roadblock on >>> their way. They just can't use the OpenSolaris package as it is, if >>> there's one, they'll have to rebuild it. And it's really dumb to >>> have >>> development tools installed on a production server, for many >>> reasons. >>> >>> Short story, it should be in. >>> >>> PS: We really should start encouraging people to use distro packages >>> at >>> some point. >>> >>> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 16:34 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: >>>> Hi list, >>>> >>>> according to the TRAI, all SMSC in India need to use prefixes in >>>> TON=5 >>>> (alphanumeric) source addresses since 2009-02-01. >>>> >>>> Please find a corresponding patch against 1.4.3 and CVS HEAD at >>>> >>>> http://www.kannel.org/~tolj/patchsets/TRAI/ >>>> >>>> along with the official direction statement of the TRAI. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if we want to "mainline" this into CVS, since it >>>> exposes another >>>> config directive to the smsc group. But as this is of general >>>> interest to all >>>> users from India, please feel free to incorporate the patch to your >>>> production >>>> systems. >>>> >>>> Any opinions if we want this (or modified) to go into CVS? I'm +0 >>>> on it, not >>>> really sure and want to hear some opinions from the group. >>>> >>>> Stipe >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Enver >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > > > -- > Regards, > Kenny > p: +2348034939090, +919948701337 > e: [email protected] > w: http://www.nuObjects.com > > Enterprise SMS Solutions | Managed Hosting | Enterprise Software > Development | eCommerce Application Development >