Re: {PATCH] final smsc-id passing in ack msg type
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | tolj.org system architecture |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alexander Malysh schrieb:
> we have already callback infrastructure, it's called DLR :)
> I don't see sense in this feature because all this could be done with
> already implemented
> and well known method DLR.
I object. This "can" be done with DLR, but "only" if DLRs are requested. It's
still legitime to provide the assigned smsc-id in the ack msg back, even if NO
DLR is requested.
Yes, you could make the dlr-mask that way that you get only the "SMSC accepted
the msg" DLR atually. But this implies we have doubling the load on the internal
message bus between bearerbox and smsbox. That's not really effective IMO, as
the ack msg is anyway passed back to the smsbox for the MT push and we simply
ditch in another value.
Stipe
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------