[PATCH] ok, this is the diff for esm_class, configurable from meta-data, tested and working for me...

is only implemented for smpp, for now.. Here the diff.

Comments?




--- kannel-snapshot/gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c	2009-01-29 08:38:28.000000000  
-0300
+++ gateway-1.4.3-0.4/gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c	2009-03-28  
12:00:57.000000000 -0400
@@ -743,7 +743,9 @@
{
     SMPP_PDU *pdu;
     int validity;
-
+    Octstr *esm_class_default;
+	int esm_class_value;
+
     pdu = smpp_pdu_create(submit_sm,
     	    	    	  counter_increase(smpp->message_id_counter));

@@ -854,10 +856,22 @@
         pdu->u.submit_sm.protocol_id = msg->sms.pid;

     /*
-     * set the esm_class field
-     * default is store and forward, plus udh and rpi if requested
+     * set the esm_class field from meta-data, if not set, the  
default value is asummed
+     * (Original: pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class =  
ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_STORE_AND_FORWARD_MODE;)
+     * Alvaro Talavera ([email protected]) - www.puntopy.com
      */
-    pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class =  
ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_STORE_AND_FORWARD_MODE;
+
+
+	if (msg->sms.meta_data != NULL &&
+		(esm_class_default = meta_data_get_value(msg->sms.meta_data,  
"smpp", octstr_imm("esm_class"))) != NULL) {
+			esm_class_value = atoi(octstr_get_cstr(esm_class_default));
+			debug("bb.sms.smpp",0,"esm_class meta_data received, set in %i",  
esm_class_value);
+			pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class = esm_class_value;
+	}else{
+		debug("bb.sms.smpp",0,"esm_class meta_data empty, set default.");
+		pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class = ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_DEFAULT_SMSC_MODE;
+	}
+	
     if (octstr_len(msg->sms.udhdata))
         pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class = pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class |
             ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_UDH_INDICATOR;