Re: [PATCH] Support for MS-SQL and Sybase via FreeTDS
Alejandro Guerrieri <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
No it didn't. On sqlbox code on CVS doesn't support MS-SQL right now. There's some code remnants suggesting some work done towards it, but even then, it was done using FreeTDS or ct-lib. Besides, having the code on dbpool allows for dlr's over freetds as well (see my other patch). Just like mysql, oracle, posgres, sdb, etc. Furthermore, all SQLBox DB's support are also implemented using the dbpool, so adding it at that level seems like the way to go imho. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 30/04/2009, at 14:21, Alexander Malysh wrote: > Hi, > > do we really need FreeTDS to support MS-SQL? AFAIK sqlbox supported > MS-SQL already without > FreeTDS library. > > Thanks, > Alex > > P.S. I'm not against FreeTDS but try to avoid avoidable > dependencies ;) > > Am 28.04.2009 um 22:08 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > >> Hi, >> >> I've createad a patch that implements dbpool support for MS-SQL and >> Sybase DB's by using the ct-lib layer on FreeTDS libraries. I've >> also implemented it on Sqlbox and works like a charm (I've tried on >> OS X 10.5 and Linux Fedora Core 10 32-bit). I've only tested it >> with MS-SQL Express on Windows XP, but it should theoretically work >> with any ct-lib compatible DB Engine. >> >> Here's the patch with full description, installation instructions >> and sample configuration. >> >> http://www.blogalex.com/archives/99 >> >> Yes, I'll write the userguide patch if this has any chances of >> getting into the main tree ;) >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> >