Re: LMT extensions

Hi,

without their Spec is this impossible to say if Kannel can handle  
this...

Please provide Spec.

Thanks,
Alex

Am 09.06.2009 um 10:11 schrieb V:

> Hello,
>
> Any have some experience with connection to LMT operator in Latvia  
> with
> proprietary SMPP extensions for DLR and billing reports?
> I found previous thread about it, but with no decisions..:(
>
> Kind regards,
> Martynas
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi,
>
> Am I right that LMT uses reserved command ids there?
>
> If yes, then in my opinion it may be useful to implement some API for
> adding vendor specific SMPP commands processing as DSO and after this
> LMT extension as such DSO :-)
>
>
> Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
>> LMT uses SMPP procol with some additions to it for billing and DLR  
>> purpose.
>> *
>> *For example:*
>>
>> * **LMT_REPORT – Contains information regarding the result of the
>> processing and execution of the SUBMIT_SM command;*
>> *LMT_GEN_CODE_RESP – Contains information regarding the result of the
>> processing and execution of the LMT_GEN_CODE command**
>> LMT_VERIFY_CODE_RESP – Contains information regarding the result of  
>> the
>> processing and execution of the LMT_ VERIFY_CODE command;
>> *
>> *LMT_REPORT_RESP – contains information regarding the results of the
>> LMT_REPORT command’s execution;*
>> *LMT_GEN_CODE – requests to generate access information for the  
>> Service
>> provider’s public resource, if authorization is made according to the
>> procedure outlined in Art.3.7. and 3.8. of the Addendum No.2 to this
>> Contract;*
>> *LMT_VERIFY_CODE – requests to verify the access information  
>> provided by
>> the Client for the public resource;
>>
>> Illimar
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> what is LMT extention? Could you please provide some links?
>>>
>>> Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Have somebody implemented it or its new to Kannel. Would Kannel be
>>>> interested adding support for it to Kannel if someone (me) would
>>>> write it?
>>>>
>>>> Illimar
>>>>
>>>> Jurijs Cerepanovs wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
>>>>> Current implementation needs patch for kannel - it's simply to  
>>>>> rewrite
>>>>> smpp connector for understanding LMT_REPORT e.t.c proprietary  
>>>>> packets.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has anybody implemented or added new protocol to support Latvia  
>>>>>> LMT
>>>>>> operator
>>>>>> SMPP protocol with LMT extentsions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would u suggest adding to to current SMPP development or add new
>>>>>> protocol
>>>>>> based on SMPP implementation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Illimar
>
>
> -- 
> Michael Bochkaryov
> www.netstyle.com.ua
>
>
>