Re: LMT extensions

Hi,

LMT uses SMPP meta-data optional parameters, its easy to implement it 
using meta-data build.
LMT additionally uses two specific PDU's (LMT_REPORT and 
LMT_REPORT_RESP) what must be
programmed directly into Kannel (those are actually LMT specific DLR 
PDU's and can be mapped to
DLR requests in Kannel)

We are using cvs-meta-data build with LMT patch, works correctly.

Illimar
> Hi,
>
> without their Spec is this impossible to say if Kannel can handle this...
>
> Please provide Spec.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> Am 09.06.2009 um 10:11 schrieb V:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Any have some experience with connection to LMT operator in Latvia with
>> proprietary SMPP extensions for DLR and billing reports?
>> I found previous thread about it, but with no decisions..:(
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Martynas
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am I right that LMT uses reserved command ids there?
>>
>> If yes, then in my opinion it may be useful to implement some API for
>> adding vendor specific SMPP commands processing as DSO and after this
>> LMT extension as such DSO :-)
>>
>>
>> Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
>>> LMT uses SMPP procol with some additions to it for billing and DLR 
>>> purpose.
>>> *
>>> *For example:*
>>>
>>> * **LMT_REPORT – Contains information regarding the result of the
>>> processing and execution of the SUBMIT_SM command;*
>>> *LMT_GEN_CODE_RESP – Contains information regarding the result of the
>>> processing and execution of the LMT_GEN_CODE command**
>>> LMT_VERIFY_CODE_RESP – Contains information regarding the result of the
>>> processing and execution of the LMT_ VERIFY_CODE command;
>>> *
>>> *LMT_REPORT_RESP – contains information regarding the results of the
>>> LMT_REPORT command’s execution;*
>>> *LMT_GEN_CODE – requests to generate access information for the Service
>>> provider’s public resource, if authorization is made according to the
>>> procedure outlined in Art.3.7. and 3.8. of the Addendum No.2 to this
>>> Contract;*
>>> *LMT_VERIFY_CODE – requests to verify the access information 
>>> provided by
>>> the Client for the public resource;
>>>
>>> Illimar
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> what is LMT extention? Could you please provide some links?
>>>>
>>>> Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Have somebody implemented it or its new to Kannel. Would Kannel be
>>>>> interested adding support for it to Kannel if someone (me) would
>>>>> write it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Illimar
>>>>>
>>>>> Jurijs Cerepanovs wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
>>>>>> Current implementation needs patch for kannel - it's simply to 
>>>>>> rewrite
>>>>>> smpp connector for understanding LMT_REPORT e.t.c proprietary 
>>>>>> packets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has anybody implemented or added new protocol to support Latvia LMT
>>>>>>> operator
>>>>>>> SMPP protocol with LMT extentsions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would u suggest adding to to current SMPP development or add new
>>>>>>> protocol
>>>>>>> based on SMPP implementation?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Illimar
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Michael Bochkaryov
>> www.netstyle.com.ua
>>
>>
>>
>
>