Re: LMT extensions

Well, you'll definitely need to patch a lot of code to add proprietary  
PDU's.

[I can't imagine why would someone need to bloat SMPP to that extent,  
for what matters]

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]



On 11/06/2009, at 9:44, V wrote:

> Hello,
>
> it is not the problem about TLV, because we are running kannel from  
> cvs
> branch. It is the problem with proprietary PDU's..
>
> regards,
> Martynas
>
>> You can checkout the cvs version of kannel which is able to handle
>> customized TLVs on smpp...
>>
>> Julien
>>
>> 2009/6/9 V <[email protected]>:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Yes, we already run kannel with meta-data/tlv support (cvs  
>>> branch). But,
>>> it's strange, why LMT use some PDU, that are non standart.
>>>
>>> On what conditions we could get that patch?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Martynas
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> LMT uses SMPP meta-data optional parameters, its easy to  
>>>> implement it
>>>> using meta-data build.
>>>> LMT additionally uses two specific PDU's (LMT_REPORT and
>>>> LMT_REPORT_RESP) what must be
>>>> programmed directly into Kannel (those are actually LMT specific  
>>>> DLR
>>>> PDU's and can be mapped to
>>>> DLR requests in Kannel)
>>>>
>>>> We are using cvs-meta-data build with LMT patch, works correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Illimar
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> without their Spec is this impossible to say if Kannel can handle
>>>>> this...
>>>>>
>>>>> Please provide Spec.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 09.06.2009 um 10:11 schrieb V:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any have some experience with connection to LMT operator in  
>>>>>> Latvia
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> proprietary SMPP extensions for DLR and billing reports?
>>>>>> I found previous thread about it, but with no decisions..:(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>> Martynas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am I right that LMT uses reserved command ids there?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If yes, then in my opinion it may be useful to implement some  
>>>>>> API for
>>>>>> adding vendor specific SMPP commands processing as DSO and  
>>>>>> after this
>>>>>> LMT extension as such DSO :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
>>>>>>> LMT uses SMPP procol with some additions to it for billing and  
>>>>>>> DLR
>>>>>>> purpose.
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> *For example:*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * **LMT_REPORT – Contains information regarding the result of  
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> processing and execution of the SUBMIT_SM command;*
>>>>>>> *LMT_GEN_CODE_RESP – Contains information regarding the result  
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> processing and execution of the LMT_GEN_CODE command**
>>>>>>> LMT_VERIFY_CODE_RESP – Contains information regarding the result
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> processing and execution of the LMT_ VERIFY_CODE command;
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> *LMT_REPORT_RESP – contains information regarding the results of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> LMT_REPORT command’s execution;*
>>>>>>> *LMT_GEN_CODE – requests to generate access information for the
>>>>>>> Service
>>>>>>> provider’s public resource, if authorization is made according  
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> procedure outlined in Art.3.7. and 3.8. of the Addendum No.2  
>>>>>>> to this
>>>>>>> Contract;*
>>>>>>> *LMT_VERIFY_CODE – requests to verify the access information
>>>>>>> provided by
>>>>>>> the Client for the public resource;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Illimar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> what is LMT extention? Could you please provide some links?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have somebody implemented it or its new to Kannel. Would  
>>>>>>>>> Kannel be
>>>>>>>>> interested adding support for it to Kannel if someone (me)  
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> write it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Illimar
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jurijs Cerepanovs wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Current implementation needs patch for kannel - it's simply  
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> rewrite
>>>>>>>>>> smpp connector for understanding LMT_REPORT e.t.c proprietary
>>>>>>>>>> packets.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Has anybody implemented or added new protocol to support  
>>>>>>>>>>> Latvia
>>>>>>>>>>> LMT
>>>>>>>>>>> operator
>>>>>>>>>>> SMPP protocol with LMT extentsions?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Would u suggest adding to to current SMPP development or  
>>>>>>>>>>> add new
>>>>>>>>>>> protocol
>>>>>>>>>>> based on SMPP implementation?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Illimar
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Michael Bochkaryov
>>>>>> www.netstyle.com.ua
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Julien Buratto
>>
>
>
>