Re: PANIC bearerbox cvs-20090902

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:26:33PM +0300, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I cannot find anything wrong with the code at that point. However, it looks
> like memory corruption. Could you please use spool instead of file? It is
> safer, more efficient and faster than file. In addition it uses different
> memory structures than file and you should get away with it.
> 
> I will update and run valgrind on it over the weekend. Unfortunately, I don't
> have smsc connections, but I hope I can catch the problem with fake smsc. If
> not, someone else from the list will have to look at it.

FWIW, I've done some successful testing with the smsc.pl that comes with
Net::SMPP, it's simple and very limited, but good enough to setup a connection
and so forth.

   Damián Viano(Des).