Re: PANIC bearerbox cvs-20090902

Nope, fakesmsc implements a propietary protocol (that's why you use  
smsc-type = "fake" and not "smpp") and it's useful for testing routes  
and services. To test smpp you have a bunch of options, to name a few:

1. A "real" SMSC (if you're lucky enough).
2. Logica's SMSC Simulator
3. Kannel's own drive_smpp (it's on the test folder).
4. Net:SMPP smsc.pl

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]



On 11/09/2009, at 15:12, Nikos Balkanas wrote:

> Thanks,
>
> Does it work with fakesms? I don't have any real smsc connections.
>
> I will first try to use fakesmsc, that I know from before. If i get  
> into trouble i will drop you a line.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Damian Viano" <[email protected] 
> >
> To: "Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Dante Moreno" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:29 PM
> Subject: Re: PANIC bearerbox cvs-20090902
>
>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:26:33PM +0300, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I cannot find anything wrong with the code at that point. However,  
>>> it looks
>>> like memory corruption. Could you please use spool instead of  
>>> file? It is
>>> safer, more efficient and faster than file. In addition it uses  
>>> different
>>> memory structures than file and you should get away with it.
>>>
>>> I will update and run valgrind on it over the weekend.  
>>> Unfortunately, I don't
>>> have smsc connections, but I hope I can catch the problem with  
>>> fake smsc. If
>>> not, someone else from the list will have to look at it.
>>
>> FWIW, I've done some successful testing with the smsc.pl that comes  
>> with
>> Net::SMPP, it's simple and very limited, but good enough to setup a  
>> connection
>> and so forth.
>>
>>  Damiαn Viano(Des).
>
>