SMSC CIMD2 wrong answer when it made an error report

angela86 walczak <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I'm using Kannel 1.4.3 stable and SQLBOX 0.7.2 and oracle database for the
DLR, and SMS.

CIMD2 100.000 by sending an SMS, I noticed last remaining SMS reports,
analyzing the problem using the log I found that a rare case of a randomly
occurring response to the SMSC after sending an SMS makes communication not
properly report the sqlbox not erase it in the table reports.
Carefully looking at the specifications "CIMD Interface Specification
SC70.pdf" page 12, we
submit request message (03) ----> submit message response (53), for 99% of
SMS is so, however, comes as part of the log below which results are not
returning this further and staying in the table reports forever.

2009-09-10 11:16:40 [11,651] [6] DEBUG: CIMD2 [first]: sending: <? 03:089
021: +48666777888 023: 050:173 056:14 055:0 044:0 033: Simple 030:17 F0
msg->
2009-09-10 11:16:40 [11,651] [6] DEBUG: CIMD2 [first]: received: <? 23:074
021:48666777888 060:090911131639 061:3 063:090911131639 EE?>
2009-09-10 11:16:40 [11,651] [6] DEBUG: CIMD2 [first]: received: <? 53:089
021:48666777888 060:090911131639 A3?>


Should I get

2009-09-10 11:16:40 [11,651] [6] DEBUG: CIMD2 [first]: received: <? 53:089
021:48666777888 060:090911131639 A3?>
2009-09-10 11:16:40 [11,651] [6] DEBUG: CIMD2 [first]: received: <? 23:074
021:48666777888 060:090911131639 061:3 063:090911131639 EE?>


I cordially greet Angel81
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.