Re: HTTP SMSC with the latest CVS

Hmm, what about the configuration files?

--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]



On 16/09/2009, at 16:52, sangprabv wrote:

> Not all received means not all MO received by bearerbox, this happened
> only if I use CVS-200909004. If I rollbacked to CVS-20080727 all MO  
> are
> received and processed. I can't provide any relevant log because  
> nothing
> weird with the log (I set the verbosity to 0), it just can't received
> all requested MO. The way I tested it is to create simple PHP script
> with CURL function and loop it to hit the Kannel HTTP SMSC URL with  
> the
> n amount hits. Just now I tried to hit 200 MO and CVS-20090904 only
> received 146 MO, while the other CVS sucessfully received 200. I  
> have no
> idea what's going on here. Since I didn't make any change with the  
> code.
>
>
>
> WIlly
>
>
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:24 +0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
>> You'll have to be a little more specific than "not all received" if
>> you expect to receive any help from list members.
>>
>> Please describe all the steps you took, and post relevant log files
>> fragments where we may find hints about what's happening.
>>
>> Is there any message on the log files when a message is lost?
>>
>> How did you queue the 1000 messages?
>>
>> The fieldmap patch doesn't modify the kannel http-smsc, only the
>> generic. You reported that the same problem occurs with the kannel
>> smsc as well, so I'd start looking on other places.
>>
>> And _please_ do not cross-post.
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16/09/2009, at 10:54, sangprabv wrote:
>>
>>> Bearerbox didn't receive all. I tried to send 1000 MO but not all
>>> received. It doesn't happen with 20080727 cvs version. And also this
>>> morning I tried 1.4.3, it seems received all 1000 MO. Does fieldmap
>>> patch cause this problem?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Willy
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 10:41 +0200, Franck LAMASUTA wrote:
>>>> Willy,
>>>>
>>>> Are the MO received by bearerbox and not processed or are they not
>>>> received at all?
>>>> Did you get anything interesting in the log files?
>>>>
>>>> Franck
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sangprabv
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:29 AM
>>>>> To: [email protected];Kannel Devel
>>>>> Subject: HTTP SMSC with the latest CVS
>>>>>
>>>>> I found that using the latest CVS cause not all MO received and
>>>>> processed. Is it a bug? Because if I use CVS-20080727 all MO
>>>>> received
>>>>> and processed 100%. I simulated generic and Kannel HTTP SMSC
>>>>> all returns
>>>>> the same problem. TIA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Willy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>