Re: HTTP SMSC with the latest CVS

<while grabbing my crystal ball> Yes, both are identical! ;)

Now seriously, we cannot help you if you don't give us some leads.

Post as much information as possible:

* Actual URL's you're using.
* Configuration files
* Log files (even if you think nothing's there, there might be  
something you're not seeing)
* Platform (OS?, Kernel?, 32 or 64 bits? Linux?)
* PHP script you use to request the messages.

Try also running the boxes from the command line and see if anything  
shows there. Maybe you're hitting a sockets limit or something like  
that?

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]



On 16/09/2009, at 17:27, sangprabv wrote:

> Both configuration is exactly the same.
>
>
>
> Willy
>
>
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 17:24 +0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
>> Hmm, what about the configuration files?
>>
>> --
>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16/09/2009, at 16:52, sangprabv wrote:
>>
>>> Not all received means not all MO received by bearerbox, this  
>>> happened
>>> only if I use CVS-200909004. If I rollbacked to CVS-20080727 all MO
>>> are
>>> received and processed. I can't provide any relevant log because
>>> nothing
>>> weird with the log (I set the verbosity to 0), it just can't  
>>> received
>>> all requested MO. The way I tested it is to create simple PHP script
>>> with CURL function and loop it to hit the Kannel HTTP SMSC URL with
>>> the
>>> n amount hits. Just now I tried to hit 200 MO and CVS-20090904 only
>>> received 146 MO, while the other CVS sucessfully received 200. I
>>> have no
>>> idea what's going on here. Since I didn't make any change with the
>>> code.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> WIlly
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:24 +0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
>>>> You'll have to be a little more specific than "not all received" if
>>>> you expect to receive any help from list members.
>>>>
>>>> Please describe all the steps you took, and post relevant log files
>>>> fragments where we may find hints about what's happening.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any message on the log files when a message is lost?
>>>>
>>>> How did you queue the 1000 messages?
>>>>
>>>> The fieldmap patch doesn't modify the kannel http-smsc, only the
>>>> generic. You reported that the same problem occurs with the kannel
>>>> smsc as well, so I'd start looking on other places.
>>>>
>>>> And _please_ do not cross-post.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> --
>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 16/09/2009, at 10:54, sangprabv wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bearerbox didn't receive all. I tried to send 1000 MO but not all
>>>>> received. It doesn't happen with 20080727 cvs version. And also  
>>>>> this
>>>>> morning I tried 1.4.3, it seems received all 1000 MO. Does  
>>>>> fieldmap
>>>>> patch cause this problem?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Willy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 10:41 +0200, Franck LAMASUTA wrote:
>>>>>> Willy,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are the MO received by bearerbox and not processed or are they  
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> received at all?
>>>>>> Did you get anything interesting in the log files?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Franck
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sangprabv
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:29 AM
>>>>>>> To: [email protected];Kannel Devel
>>>>>>> Subject: HTTP SMSC with the latest CVS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I found that using the latest CVS cause not all MO received and
>>>>>>> processed. Is it a bug? Because if I use CVS-20080727 all MO
>>>>>>> received
>>>>>>> and processed 100%. I simulated generic and Kannel HTTP SMSC
>>>>>>> all returns
>>>>>>> the same problem. TIA
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Willy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>