Re: access log format

Alok Vaidya <alok 'at' routesms.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry I didn't get you.

Are you programmatically looking for sent/failed SMS by looking
at Kannel logs?

> Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
>     Alok Vaidya <alok 'at' routesms.com> writes:
>
>
>
>         Hi,
>
>         Thanks for replying. Yes I checked the documentation we can certainly have a
>         custom format, but it is about the events that I talking here like "Sent SMS"/
>         "FAILED SMS"/"Discarded SMS" etc., I see some changes there. Mostly I have
>         figured them out but, I fail to understand some other entries which I have
>         mentioned below as also I want to know more such changes.
>
>         Let me elaborate why this causes problems. Our parser uses patterns such as
>         "Failed SMS" to search for current (14.2 box) entries, now this event logging
>         has changed to "FAILED SEND SMS" naturally this will not be picked up and hence
>         we loose on such entries. That's my point here.
>
>
>     I might be a little off topic, but why not using the mechanism
>     made for that kind of things, e.g. receiving delivery reports
>     from Kannel? It is supported, lets you ask what information you
>     need, and is of course "supported" accross versions.
>
>
>
>

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau