Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

can you please give me link to this discussion?

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 22.10.2009 um 13:17 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

> Hi,
>
> Oh boy. You missed all the fun :-)
>
> Original email by Latitude Test on 13/10/2009, where DELIVERD DLRs  
> are misreported by kannel as failures (type 2). There was quite a  
> discussion about whether it was a kannel bug, or an out of spec DLR.  
> In the end it was a consensus that kannel needed a patch.
>
> Bottom of the line: Spec is very loose at this point about DLR  
> fields. Kannel expects either an exact format (sscanf) or it reverts  
> to a more flexible old style search. Problem is that in the search  
> it assumes that the value of each field is followed by space, and  
> that is not necessarily true (if field is last in DLR).
>
> Seikath also said that he has a couple of cases like that.
>
> BTW, I have asked Latitude to test it, because I cannot, but he  
> seems to get disappeared after creating all this stir :-(
>
> BR
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alexander Malysh
> To: Nikos Balkanas
> Cc: [email protected] Devel
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:08 AM
> Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c
>
> Hi Nikos,
>
> could you please explain why we need this patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander Malysh
>
> Am 19.10.2009 um 18:30 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A trivial patch, that should be able to handle all DLRs as long as  
>> they keep formal tags.
>>
>> Please test.
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos<smsc_smpp.diff>
>
>