Re: DLR counters on the status page
Alejandro Guerrieri <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Done already, testing right now... -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 11/11/2009, at 12:33, Alexander Malysh wrote: > > Am 11.11.2009 um 12:09 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > >> Ok, so you'd like the patch to transparently handle the concept of >> "outgoing" dlrs? > > yes that would be great... This is 5 minutes patch :) > >> >> It would be useless on many drivers where Kannel's acting as a >> "client" only (SMPP for instance) but yes, on HTTP and derivatives >> would make sense. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> On 11/11/2009, at 11:42, Alexander Malysh wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 11.11.2009 um 11:38 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >>> >>>> Alex, >>>> >>>> Outgoing DLR's? At least on SMPP, there's not such a thing: when >>>> you submit an MT with dlr-mask/dlr-url set, the submit_sm PDU has >>>> the delivery receipt flag set. When the message is accepted (the >>>> SMSC sends a submit_sm_resp), kannel creates a first incoming DLR >>>> and later on the SMSC sends one incoming (deliver_sm) DLR (or >>>> more, if intermediate DLR's are enabled) with the message >>>> status(es). >>>> >>>> What do you mean with "outgoing DLR's" ? >>> >>> at least for HTTP smsc we can implement DLR forwarding... >>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -- >>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/11/2009, at 9:36, Alexander Malysh wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>> >>>>> I think we have to expand this patch to handle incoming and >>>>> outgoing DLRs. >>>>> Now we don't differentiate DLRs from SMS traffic and therefore >>>>> this is not a issue. >>>>> But if we start to differentiate DLRs from SMS we need to split >>>>> it to incoming/outgoing >>>>> the same as for SMS traffic. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Alexander Malysh >>>>> >>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 08:13 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >>>>> >>>>>> Any objections? Can I commit? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/11/2009, at 15:46, Stipe Tolj wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb: >>>>>>>> This patch adds separate dlr counters on the status page. >>>>>>>> This is much >>>>>>>> clearer than now imho, where we have dlr's and mo's mixed on >>>>>>>> the same >>>>>>>> counter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For example: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, *dlr (0.23,0.12,0.12) >>>>>>>> msg/sec*, >>>>>>>> outbound (0.12,0.06,0.06) msg/sec >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SMSC connections: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *fake*[fake] FAKE:10000 (online 109s, rcvd 0, *dlr 14*, >>>>>>>> sent 7, >>>>>>>> failed 0, queued 0 msgs) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.blogalex.com/archives/222 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yep, I'm in... +0 from my side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stipe >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> Kölner Landstrasse 419 >>>>>>> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany >>>>>>> >>>>>>> tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation >>>>>>> (KSF) >>>>>>> http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >