Re: Patch: wtls provision
"Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001b01ca647b$ec412dd0$02b2a8c0@tardis> |
Dear Stipe, Thanks for taking the time to test it. Anybody reading this, hold testing for now. Let me explain: As mentioned, wtls has been thoroughly tested in Solaris, not by sending millions of requests, but by individual requests from real phones and simulators. It shouldn't have such issues! I am afraid that the patch did not come out right and will have to resubmit. The log entry from 9203: 2009-11-13 17:28:16 [17493] [9] DEBUG: You need to create wtls_pdulist_destroy! shows that at least ./wap/wap_events.c is not patched. I am not using it in the final code. My apologies, let me take another look at it over the weekend and resubmit on Monday. BR, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]> To: "Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:37 PM Subject: Re: Patch: wtls provision > Nikos Balkanas schrieb: >> Dear friends, >> >> This is a long overdue contribution to kannel's wap. It will provide >> wtls functionality. It has been thoroughly tested in Solaris, and >> compiles cleanly in Linux. >> >> I used indent to format the structure, so a lot of the differences will >> be formatting. Nevertheless, there is a lot of code in there that needed >> to make it work. Let me know if the cvs diff is the best way to submit >> it, or whether a tarball of the sources would be better. I've have had >> some issues with cvs diff in the past, so if you get any compilation >> warnings, I may have to go with a tarball. > > Hi Nikos, > > first of all, congratulations for the enormous work effort put into the > WTLS > layer here. We're overwhelmed, and grateful for such a contributer like > you are. :) > > As promised, I gave it a quick shot to see how it works out. In fact I > haven't > reviewed the code much, bust had just a rudimentary glance over it. I > rather > tried it in real, against a Nokia Mobile Browser 4.0 Simulator (on top of > Win32/XP). > > wapbox.9202.log contains the log for accessing port 9202 (connection-less > secure > mode), which bangs (PANICs) after some time. > > wapbox.9203.log contains the log for accessing port 9203 > (connection-orientated > secure mode), which seems to do something useful, but starts to loop at > some point. > > In both cases, I don't get any clean page view of the WML deck, adressing > http://m.google.de/. > > In 9203 mode, I get from the Nokia Diagnostic tool at least the following > details presented: > > - WTLS session ID: 76220880 > - Algorithms: > Bulk Enc: RC5_CBC > MAC: SHA1 > Key Exchange: RSA_anon > Compression: none > - Key Size: > Bulk Enc: 8 > MAC: 20 > Key Exchange: 30575 > Compression: none > - Certificates: none > > Hope this helps. > > Actually I would love to try it with a real phone (i.e. my old Nokia > 7110), but > I don't have it right now available. So if there are some more people out > there > to give Nikos a hand in debugging, please test with a real device. > > Stipe > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > KΓ¶lner Landstrasse 419 > 40589 DΞ“Ξsseldorf, NRW, Germany > > tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) > http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ > > mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org > ------------------------------------------------------------------- >