Re: Patch: wtls provision

"Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <001b01ca647b$ec412dd0$02b2a8c0@tardis>
Dear Stipe,

Thanks for taking the time to test it. Anybody reading this, hold testing 
for now. Let me explain:

As mentioned, wtls has been thoroughly tested in Solaris, not by sending 
millions of requests, but by individual requests from real phones and 
simulators. It shouldn't have such issues!

I am afraid that the patch did not come out right and will have to resubmit. 
The log entry from 9203:

2009-11-13 17:28:16 [17493] [9] DEBUG: You need to create 
wtls_pdulist_destroy!

shows that at least ./wap/wap_events.c is not patched. I am not using it in 
the final code.

My apologies, let me take another look at it over the weekend and resubmit 
on Monday.

BR,
Nikos


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>
To: "Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: wtls provision


> Nikos Balkanas schrieb:
>> Dear friends,
>>
>> This is a long overdue contribution to kannel's wap. It will provide
>> wtls functionality. It has been thoroughly tested in Solaris, and
>> compiles cleanly in Linux.
>>
>> I used indent to format the structure, so a lot of the differences will
>> be formatting. Nevertheless, there is a lot of code in there that needed
>> to make it work. Let me know if the cvs diff is the best way to submit
>> it, or whether a tarball of the sources would be better. I've have had
>> some issues with cvs diff in the past, so if you get any compilation
>> warnings, I may have to go with a tarball.
>
> Hi Nikos,
>
> first of all, congratulations for the enormous work effort put into the 
> WTLS
> layer here. We're overwhelmed, and grateful for such a contributer like 
> you are. :)
>
> As promised, I gave it a quick shot to see how it works out. In fact I 
> haven't
> reviewed the code much, bust had just a rudimentary glance over it. I 
> rather
> tried it in real, against a Nokia Mobile Browser 4.0 Simulator (on top of 
> Win32/XP).
>
> wapbox.9202.log contains the log for accessing port 9202 (connection-less 
> secure
> mode), which bangs (PANICs) after some time.
>
> wapbox.9203.log contains the log for accessing port 9203 
> (connection-orientated
> secure mode), which seems to do something useful, but starts to loop at 
> some point.
>
> In both cases, I don't get any clean page view of the WML deck, adressing
> http://m.google.de/.
>
> In 9203 mode, I get from the Nokia Diagnostic tool at least the following
> details presented:
>
> - WTLS session ID: 76220880
> - Algorithms:
>  Bulk Enc: RC5_CBC
>  MAC: SHA1
>  Key Exchange: RSA_anon
>  Compression: none
> - Key Size:
>  Bulk Enc: 8
>  MAC: 20
>  Key Exchange: 30575
>  Compression: none
> - Certificates: none
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Actually I would love to try it with a real phone (i.e. my old Nokia 
> 7110), but
> I don't have it right now available. So if there are some more people out 
> there
> to give Nikos a hand in debugging, please test with a real device.
>
> Stipe
>
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> KΓ¶lner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 DΞ“Ξsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.