RE: Sqlbox acks

Yeah, those things are definitely on the list of things to-do.
But they will be subject to another patch.

== Rene

From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, 13 August, 2010 21:38
To: Rene Kluwen; 'Alejandro Guerrieri'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks

What about some sanity checks? NULL msg, corrupted msg (cannot be unpacked),
etc.?
Also do you check about heartbeat & admin msgs? bb thinks it is an smsbox...
 
Otherwise +1
 
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Rene Kluwen 
To: 'Alejandro Guerrieri' 
Cc: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:42 PM
Subject: RE: Sqlbox acks

You were ahead of me. Yes, I needed to destroy that as well… fixed at the
same time that you wrote this email :=).

== Rene

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, 12 August, 2010 21:40
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks

Perhaps you need to destroy mack also?
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]



On 12/08/2010, at 21:05, Rene Kluwen wrote:

Does anybody object to this simple patch which will take away a lot of
worries of sqlbox users?
 
It generates an ack to bearerbox if a message is directed to sqlbox itself
(i.e. not to an smsbox).
 
== Rene
 
<sqlbox_acks_1.patch>