Re: Open smppbox queues -> priority queues

Can fakesmpp help? The test wouldn't be isolated, which would be ideal, but 
I need to implement an ESME client for that. But maybe it could show in:

fakesmpp <- bb1 <- smppbox <- bb2 <- fakesmpp

You will need to feed fake smpp with a copy of bb1's configuration, but with 
smsbox-port set to bb2.

If not, let me know and I will add support for smppbox.

BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rene Kluwen" <[email protected]>
To: "'Nikos Balkanas'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 2:41 PM
Subject: RE: Open smppbox queues -> priority queues


> Before, I could not test properly. Just got my office system & Internet
> connection back yesterday, since we've moved to another place.
> Testing via a GSM Internet link is not quite ideal :)...
>
> So I've got to think of some kind of bench mark (ideas?) to compare the
> different implementations with.
>
> == Rene
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 August, 2010 00:53
> To: Rene Kluwen; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Open smppbox queues -> priority queues
>
> Hi Rene,
>
> I am really confused here. I am still waiting for an answer. Are queues
> slowing down performance or not? If yes by what amount? Priority queues 
> are
> the real hogger, especially the larger they get. I don't think that this 
> is
> necessary, since they are prioritized in bb. I think since they are such a
> performance degradation, they shouldn't be implemented more than once.
>
> Lastly consider that if you put priority queues in smppbox, there will
> always be people thinking that they do not work the way they are supposed 
> to
>
> ;-)
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Rene Kluwen
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:00 PM
> Subject: Open smppbox queues -> priority queues
>
>
> Here again another patch, which uses priority queues.
>
> Looking for a way to come up with representative performance figures so we
> can decide which implementation is best.
>
> == Rene
>
>
>
>