Re: [RFC] adding CMPP (China Mobile's SMPP clone) SMSC client side module
Alejandro Guerrieri <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Agreeing 100% here. If it's possible to abstract it on what we found (without cluttering the configuration too much of course) I agree it would be better. If it's not possible, I agree that having support for extra carriers is a good thing and I'm +1. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 17/09/2010, at 19:00, Rene Kluwen wrote: > Exactly. Is this really different from plain old SMPP? > Maybe a configuration parameter can do the trick? > > If not, then everything that makes Kannel more compatible with smsc > operators is welcome. > > == Rene > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Alexander Malysh > Sent: Friday, 17 September, 2010 14:12 > To: Stipe Tolj > Cc: kannel_dev_mailinglist > Subject: Re: [RFC] adding CMPP (China Mobile's SMPP clone) SMSC client side > module > > Hi, > > is there any spec around? are the differences really so big that we need > extra smsc module? > > Thanks, > Alexander Malysh > > Am 17.09.2010 um 13:40 schrieb Stipe Tolj: > >> Hi list, >> >> I have public domain code that has been developed to support CMPP (the > China >> Mobile's clone implementation of SMPP). >> >> I'd be +1 to add it, so we extend the range of support to a very big MNO > in the >> market, as various Huawei SMSC types can use CMPP. What about others? Is > there >> any interest in adding it? >> >> Stipe >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Kölner Landstrasse 419 >> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany >> >> tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) >> http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ >> >> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > >