Re: [PATCH] Logging to syslog
"Milan P. Stanic" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 14:58, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Am 30.11.2010 14:45, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > > That's extremely unflexible imho. If you want to get kannel to log alone without being cluttered with other daemon's logs, you're out of luck. > > > > In our case, we'd like to use it for remote logging, so we'd use one of the "user" facilities to get kannel and _only_ kannel on it, directed to kannel-only log files. > > > > I don't see the problem on allowing the extra flexibility. It's definitely useful for our scenario at least. > > yep, agree... we keep the default as Alexander suggest as 'LOG_DAEMON' facility, > but provide the capabilities to extend what we want. Right? Right, IMHO. Most modern syslog servers have options to match program name (even regex) and dispatch log messages according to admin defined rules. -- Kind regards, Milan -------------------------------------------------- Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code.