urgent help! CIMD2 missing DLR answer!

"Beatrice Tamburrino" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi!

I have a really urgent problem! We have Kannel 1.4.3 Operating on the customer site.. using the protocol cimd2 to an SMSC (actually we have 5 different SMSC) but the customer wants us to send the SMS only to the first SMSC (named sc1)- the SMSC provider has confirmed that he allows DLR (so far so good)

Im facing some strange problem that I cant understand:

When I send a message, I quickly receive the ack and the DLR code 8. This is good, means the DLR funtion works and the SMSC has received our message. I sent the message to my phone and I could see that the message was delivered on my phone. than I waited for the DLR code 1 (confirmed deliver to the phone) but I saw in my logs that the code 1 was never received.  I tested a lot of times and I saw that sometimes (very rarely) I also received the code 1! So sometimes it workes but the most time I get
only the 8.

I cecked the status file of the kannel- there I could see the follow entry.

DLR: 3 queued, using internal storage

Box connections:
    smsbox:smsbox_XXXX, IP 127.0.0.1 (0 queued), (on-line 0d 0h 23m 17s) 

SMSC connections:
    sc1    CIMD2:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:yyy:ZZZZ (online 1229s, rcvd 5, sent 4, failed 0, queued 0 msgs)

What I dont understand: the DLR: 3 queued entry seems that the missing DLR code 1 is somekind of buffered?? so this are the 3 missing DLR answer that I need. Is that problem on Kannel side or provider side??? I would appreshiate if somebody could explain what this means and maybe also give me a hint how to solve this!! :)



I need to solve this till tomorrow, and after LONG time research I really dont have a clue what to do know.. 

Pleas help!!!

many many thanks in advance!

cheers

beatrice

-- 
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!  
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.