Re: [PATCH] Database SMSC driver

Hi Donald,

how about loop SMSC + sqlbox. I think it would be really easy to have such setup without DB SMSC module?

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 14.03.2011 um 13:57 schrieb Donald Jackson:

> Hi Rene,
> 
> SQLBox is built to be an injection mechanism into the bearerbox (and also can be used as a proxy) it's not designed to be an endpoint. I spoke with Alejandro about the possibility of simply using SQLBox in this fashion without connecting it to a bearerbox and we agreed that this would not be the correct solution and more along the lines of a kludge/hack. So rather than this I implemented an SMSC DB driver to be used as an endpoint (generates ACK's etc on successful inserts) so the behaviour is more defined and appropriate.
> 
> Hope this makes sense,
> Donald Jackson
> www.panaceamobile.com
> 
> 
> On 14 Mar 2011, at 2:46 PM, Rene Kluwen wrote:
> 
>> What's the advantage of using this driver, over using sqlbox?
>> 
>> == Rene
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>> Of Donald Jackson
>> Sent: Monday, 14 March, 2011 13:39
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [PATCH] Database SMSC driver
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> Here is a new SMSC driver which takes messages and inserts them into a
>> database table for processing. It also polls (configurable) database tables
>> for MO's and DLR's if necessary.
>> 
>> This is useful if you have messages incoming over SMPP (or other scenarios I
>> haven't thought of :D) and want them in an easy to use format for bulk
>> processing.
>> 
>> I intentionally didn't use the mysql-connection group because it would
>> require too many changes in layers above as the full Cfg* context isn't
>> provided to the driver. It currently only supports MySQL but could support
>> others in future.
>> 
>> Enjoy!
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Donald Jackson
>> www.panaceamobile.com
>> 
>> 
> 
>