Re: [PATCH] Throttling support for AT smsc

Hi Alex,

AT commands are synchronous and there is only one thread
for sending and receving messages

Why should i implement the load_XX function to do the trick ?
(there is no need here to modify the PrivAT2data structure)

Vincent



Le 18/05/2011 20:50, Alexander Malysh a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> why don't you use load_XX support? See smsc_smpp as example.
> With only sleep thread will wakeup if new messages available for sending
> and therefore you don't guarantee throughput.
>
> Alex
>
> Am 18.05.2011 um 14:48 schrieb Vincent CHAVANIS:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is a small patch to support throttling on AT smsc
>>
>> Any comment ?
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Vincent.
>> <smsc_at_throttling.txt>
>