Re: devel Digest, Vol 57, Issue 14

Hello there.

I have problem for u guys.

Can u solve the following problem?


Consider following scenario:

There are three persons, named A, B and C.

A's mobile no is M, B's no is N and C's no is P.

The C is GSM/GPRS modem and is connected to pc/Server .

B has forwarded all its voice calls to C.

Now, A (call originator) calls to B (call forwarder), call gets
forwarded to C (call terminated).

Here, C is connected to pc/server, how do I extract call details using
at commands?

I want following details to be extracted.
1. the main call originating number (ie, from where call originated,
not from where is forwarded, ie A's no what is M) 2. the number from
where call got forwarded (ie, from where call forwarded from, ie, B's
no N )

So, can any one tell me how do i achieve that using AT commands or any
other way?



Regards
 - Rajendra Pondel
http://www.vakow.net


On 5/21/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Send devel mailing list submissions to
> 	[email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	[email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	[email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: [PATCH] Throttling support for AT smsc (Alexander Malysh)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 20:16:40 +0200
> From: Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Throttling support for AT smsc
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> this is very easy:
> a) if you sleep for throughput you don't receive any MOs
> b) if you have something to send, this thread will be waked up any time and
> therefore there is no throughput garantee
>
> if you use load_XXX then all these issues can be avoided.
>
> Alex
>
> Am 19.05.2011 um 13:04 schrieb Vincent CHAVANIS:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> AT commands are synchronous and there is only one thread
>> for sending and receving messages
>>
>> Why should i implement the load_XX function to do the trick ?
>> (there is no need here to modify the PrivAT2data structure)
>>
>> Vincent
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 18/05/2011 20:50, Alexander Malysh a ?crit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> why don't you use load_XX support? See smsc_smpp as example.
>>> With only sleep thread will wakeup if new messages available for sending
>>> and therefore you don't guarantee throughput.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> Am 18.05.2011 um 14:48 schrieb Vincent CHAVANIS:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Here is a small patch to support throttling on AT smsc
>>>>
>>>> Any comment ?
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>> Vincent.
>>>> <smsc_at_throttling.txt>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
> End of devel Digest, Vol 57, Issue 14
> *************************************
>