RE: [PATCH] Lightning speed Dict hash table
"Rene Kluwen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well... Considering the figures it is clear that either of your patches can make a big difference to Kannel's performance. MHO is that we go for the least complex patch, if test results appear more or less the same between the two. == Rene -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: Tuesday, 07 August, 2012 15:12 To: Stipe Tolj Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lightning speed Dict hash table Hi Stipe, this is really complex patch for the hash issue, but it could be made easier and almost the same speed. I'm not really convenient that we need to apply this complex patch... Here are my simple tests and patch attached: Command used: time ./test/test_dict -- old 2012-08-07 14:47:49 [57291] [0] DEBUG: Dict populate phase. 2012-08-07 14:48:16 [57291] [0] INFO: ok, got 200000 entries in dict1. 2012-08-07 14:48:16 [57291] [0] INFO: ok, got 200000 entries in dict2. 2012-08-07 14:48:16 [57291] [0] DEBUG: Dict lookup phase. real 0m41.842s user 0m40.680s sys 0m1.078s -- sedgewick (my patch) 2012-08-07 14:47:01 [57016] [0] DEBUG: Dict populate phase. 2012-08-07 14:47:03 [57016] [0] INFO: ok, got 200000 entries in dict1. 2012-08-07 14:47:03 [57016] [0] INFO: ok, got 200000 entries in dict2. 2012-08-07 14:47:03 [57016] [0] DEBUG: Dict lookup phase. real 0m4.160s user 0m2.998s sys 0m0.977s real 0m3.797s user 0m2.738s sys 0m1.015s real 0m3.732s user 0m2.767s sys 0m0.938s -- Bob Jenkins 2012-08-07 14:50:32 [58470] [0] DEBUG: Dict populate phase. 2012-08-07 14:50:34 [58470] [0] INFO: ok, got 200000 entries in dict1. 2012-08-07 14:50:34 [58470] [0] INFO: ok, got 200000 entries in dict2. 2012-08-07 14:50:34 [58470] [0] DEBUG: Dict lookup phase. real 0m3.747s user 0m2.682s sys 0m0.919s real 0m3.661s user 0m2.692s sys 0m0.946s real 0m3.522s user 0m2.606s sys 0m0.908s Alex