Re: [PATCH] start-at-boot / userguide

Juan Nin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <CAL52o-2k6-B50Ub=dFNUThU_MHF3jzUS_OKGPG5nnzK3fd23zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sounds good!

Thanks!

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> wrote:

> Am 03.10.2012 22:36, schrieb Juan Nin:
>
>> Was this ever commited?
>>
>
> Hi Juan,
>
> nop, this never made it's way to the SVN trunk. I'm winding this up right
> now.
>
> All I'd like to change is the name of the config directive, and use
> 'dead-start = no' (as default). The term "boot" is something strange to me
> here, even while I know what Alejandro means of course.
>
> Stipe
>
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Juan Nin <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     See attached patch for adding the start-at-boot directive (smsc
>>     group) to the Kannel User's Guide.
>>     This was the only missing part so as to get Alejandro Guerrieri's
>>     start-at-boot patch into the main tree.
>>
>>     Regards,
>>
>>     Juan
>>
>>
>>     On 5/15/11 6:53 AM, Hillel wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Alejandro,
>>
>>         Have you been able to commit your start-at-boot patch?
>>
>>         thanks
>>
>>         From: Alejandro Guerrieri<aguerrieri@kannel.__**org
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>**>
>>         To: Alexander Malysh<[email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>>
>>         Cc: Kannel Devel<[email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>>
>>
>>         Subject: Re: useful patches for everyone
>>         Message-ID:<0357DE26-1F81-__**4C34-96E7-078482437284@kannel.**
>> __org
>>         <mailto:0357DE26-1F81-4C34-**[email protected]<[email protected]>
>> >>
>>
>>         Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>>         Thanks Alex,
>>
>>         I'll write the userguide part and commit.
>>
>>         Regards,
>>
>>         Alex
>>         --
>>         Alejandro Guerrieri
>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 19/04/2011, at 11:52, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>>
>>             Hi Alex,
>>
>>             IMHO this option is not really needed and is only workaround
>>             about a fact
>>
>>         that bearerbox
>>
>>             is unable to reload configuration without restart. But
>>             reload is much
>>
>>         bigger implementation as
>>
>>             this simple "hack". If this "hack" will help much people to
>>             do cleaner
>>
>>         configuration now then I'm
>>
>>             not voting against this feature.
>>
>>             Alex, please update userguide and commit this patch if
>>             nobody has any
>>
>>         objections.
>>
>>             I'm +0
>>
>>             Thanks,
>>             Alexander Malysh
>>
>>             Am 19.04.2011 um 10:49 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>>
>>                 For KISS's sake, this doesn't clutter configuration nor
>>                 breaks backwards
>>
>>         compatibility. It doesn't hurt performance either.
>>
>>                 If you don't want to use it just ignore it completely,
>>                 the default
>>
>>         behavior if the directive is missing is to start the smsc at
>>         boot as usual,
>>         so no harm's done.
>>
>>                 Where do we trace the "absolutely necessary" line is of
>>                 course fuzzy, but
>>
>>         from what I read seems like other users would find it useful as
>>         well.
>>
>>                 Regards,
>>                 --
>>                 Alejandro Guerrieri
>>                 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                 On 19/04/2011, at 05:19, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
>>
>>                     Hi,
>>
>>                     wapbox must be kept around because of backwards
>>                     compatibility, that is a
>>
>>         must for all open source software. Users are still using it.
>>
>>                     Finally I would like to add my support for keeping
>>                     configuration
>>
>>         explosion in check. Otherwise, what a few people might gain in
>>         convenience,
>>         a lot of people might have to pay for it in terms of kannel
>>         support due to
>>         more difficult configuration. Some golden rules in configuration
>>         are:
>>
>>                     1) KISS
>>                     2) Don't expand it, unless it is absolutely necessary.
>>
>>                     Stopping service to modify configuration is a no-no.
>>                     Commenting a
>>
>>         configuration file off-line is convenience.
>>
>>                     My 2 cents,
>>                     Nikos
>>                     ----- Original Message ----- From: Juan Nin
>>                     To: Kannel Devel
>>                     Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:41 AM
>>                     Subject: Re: useful patches for everyone
>>
>>
>>                     That's what we do today, but the idea is not to have
>>                     to do any "extra"
>>
>>         work, neither having to comment/uncomment things out, nor have
>>         to add/remove
>>         config files.
>>
>>
>>                     Having the start-at-boot directive allows you to
>>                     just keep the
>>
>>         configuration defined, but the smsc does not start.
>>
>>                     So anytime you need it, you just use the start-smsc
>>                     and then the
>>
>>         stop-smsc.
>>
>>                     This is much cleaner IMHO than having to do all the
>>                     extra manual work,
>>
>>         no matter how easy that manual work it may be.
>>
>>
>>                     A similar discussion was held some months ago, can't
>>                     remember what new
>>
>>         directive it was, where the directive was finally added, since
>>         it was seen
>>         it was helpful.
>>
>>                     Not all directives are used by everyone or may be
>>                     useful for everybody,
>>
>>         that happens on any piece of software, but does not mean it's
>>         not useful,
>>         nor that it should not be added. I don't care about the WAP
>>         related parts of
>>         Kannel for example, and that doesn't mean I believe they should
>>         not exist.
>>         Adding useful things to Kannel is something that makes Kannel a
>>         better
>>         product, so I don't really see why not to add it. Maybe if it
>>         was something
>>         complicated that really messed up with the code, could be, but
>>         this is
>>         definitely not the case.
>>
>>
>>                     Just my 2 cents.
>>
>>
>>                     2011/4/18 Nikos Balkanas<[email protected]
>>                     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>
>>
>>                     What about the HTTP command start-smsc:
>>
>>                     It reloads the smsc and starts them from
>>                     configuration. Therefore you
>>
>>         could have the smsc commented out at start, then enable it in the
>>         configuration and start it from the web interface, without
>>         stooping kannel.
>>         Is that not adequate?
>>
>>                     BR,
>>                     Nikos
>>                     ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Gottgens"
>>
>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]**>>
>>
>>                     To: "Alvaro Cornejo"<cornejo.alvaro@gmail.**__com
>>                     <mailto:cornejo.alvaro@gmail.**com<[email protected]>
>> >>
>>                     Cc: "Alexander Malysh"<[email protected]
>>                     <mailto:[email protected]**>__>; "Kannel Devel"
>>
>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>
>>
>>                     Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 11:24 PM
>>
>>                     Subject: Re: useful patches for everyone
>>
>>
>>
>>                     Hello,
>>
>>                     i second that. Having the ability to start kannel
>>                     with some of the binds
>>
>>         down
>>
>>                     is so much easier in HA/Failover environments.
>>
>>                     Monday, April 18, 2011, 8:31:05 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>                     AC>  Hi Alex
>>
>>                     AC>  Another use would be when having backup links.
>>                     I do use over 20
>>
>>         modems
>>
>>                     AC>  but not have all enabled at start. In order to
>>                     not to have to reload
>>                     AC>  kannel when a new modem is needed, I do start
>>                     kannel and then stop
>>
>>         all
>>
>>                     AC>  the backup modems and I have to do the same
>>                     whenever I restart
>>
>>         kannel
>>
>>                     AC>  or the server
>>
>>                     AC>  I'll love to have this feature in standard kannel
>>
>>                     --
>>                     Best regards,
>>                     Thomas
>>                       mailto:[email protected]
>>                     <mailto:[email protected]**>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**-------
> Kölner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**-------
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.