Re: slow store_load with large queue

Is it possible to have store_load in a separate thread? So SQLBox / SMSBox
would connect before store fully loaded?

2012/10/16 spameden <[email protected]>

> Hi.
>
> I've copied both devel and users list to get quicker response, sorry if
> it's not right.
>
> We are suffering from quite slow store load (about 100sms/sec) with large
> queue (about 100k MTs).
>
> What could be a possible reason? Could it be slow disk or is there a bug
> itself inside the kannel?
>
>
> Also we encountered another error while restarting bearerbox:
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: gwlib/gw-rwlock.c:137:
> gw_rwlock_rdlock: Assertion `lock != NULL' failed.
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC:
> /usr/sbin/bearerbox(gw_backtrace+0xae) [0x48ba6e]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox(gw_panic+0x145)
> [0x48bbc5]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC:
> /usr/sbin/bearerbox(gw_rwlock_rdlock+0x54) [0x4818e4]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC:
> /usr/sbin/bearerbox(route_incoming_to_boxc+0x4b) [0x4126db]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC:
> /usr/sbin/bearerbox(bb_smscconn_receive+0x628) [0x419728]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC:
> /usr/sbin/bearerbox(bb_smscconn_sent+0x110) [0x41a3d0]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox() [0x4596af]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox() [0x45af97]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox() [0x48292e]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /lib/libpthread.so.0(+0x68ca)
> [0x7fcd35d1a8ca]
> 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)
> [0x7fcd3538fb6d]
>
> NOTE: we are using simple scheme bearerbox <-> sqlbox and when we are
> restarting we are closing sqlbox prior to bearerbox
>