Re: Does opensmppbox and smsbox have serious memory issues?

Hi,

unfortunately this file is not there anymore. Could you please new file please?

Alex

Am 07.05.2014 um 13:15 schrieb [email protected]:

> HI Hanh and Kannel developers,
>  
> The memory leaks in the latest svn for smsbox, as mentioned in your post Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 10:06:54 +0700 and  shown inhttps://www.dropbox.com/s/yjrc6wmdm0rwonz/smsbox_memleakcheck_20140503.txt
> are also contributing to the increase in the total memory leak.  Each SMSs needs to also go through smsbox.  There are memory leaks both smsbox and also in opensmppbox.
>  
> Thanks for bringing this to the attention of the Kannel devel group and producing these Valgrinds. It’s useful to see what happens to Kannel with a high throughput.
> This is currently not my area of expertise.
>  
> We need the help of the top Kannel developers to fix this, so the latest svn will be free of memory leaks.
>  
> You mention in the post on Sat, 3 May 2014 10:06:54 +0700: “Hello again, Here is valgrind report for the smsbox memory leaking. This is also the latest kannel revision 5089.
> For me, it still happen, i submit (broadcast) million SMS(s) per day within few hours at 1000 TPS of throughput. Thus each day, smsbox swallow ~ 400MB RAM and not release until server memory exhaust after few days. At this time, the box is auto restarted and i have my memory back, so on, again and again.
>  
> I not sure, but in very low throughput system, i am not aware this issue.
>  
> ==5730== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==5730==    definitely lost: 231,680 bytes in 14,480 blocks
> ==5730==    indirectly lost: 144,790 bytes in 14,479 blocks
> ==5730==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==5730==    still reachable: 1,250 bytes in 40 blocks
> ==5730==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==5730== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
> ==5730== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all ==5730== ==5730== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with:
> -v ==5730== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 45 from 10)”
>  
> rgds
>  
> From: Hanh Le Bich [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 10:32 AM
> To: Rene Kluwen
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Does opensmppbox and smsbox have serious memory issues?
>  
> No Rene, i just monitor by some mem check tool. For example, htop tell me in the fist day, opensmppbox occupied 0.1% of RAM, the next 2 day is was 0.2%, and the 5th day, it is 0.3% now. Slowly increase.
>  
> Regards, Hanh.
>  
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would you happen to have a valgrind output for this?
>  
> == Rene
>  
> From: Hanh Le Bich [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: woensdag 7 mei 2014 9:20
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Rene Kluwen; [email protected]; [email protected]
> 
> Subject: Re: Does opensmppbox and smsbox have serious memory issues?
>  
> Hello again,
> Hope you are doing great. 
> After close monitoring opensmppbox after > 4 days continuous running, I just want to inform the mem leak still happen, the box is eating few tens (or nearly hundred) byte per day at throughput 100TPS (at max) and keep increasing.
> 
> Regards, Hanh.