Re: [PATCH] orig DLR bitmask passing back via DLR msg
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 16.07.2015 15:45, schrieb Stipe Tolj:
> Am 16.07.2015 14:15, schrieb Alexander Malysh:
>>
>> I disagree to put it in dlr group because it has nothing with dlr
>> todo. To dlr group belongs submittime/donetime/errorcode etc. (means
>> any metadata that are DLR specific)
>> but original message is not related to DLR. If we think further about
>> your idea to put it in DLR group then if we want to keep e.g. message
>> body (don’t know the reason now
>> but just as example) then we will have message in DLR group? Sorry it
>> makes not sense for me.
>
> ok, then let's do 'orig_msg' group, where we CAN eventually put any
> value that has been passed at MT time. That's ok with me.
>
> I don't want to stress the msg field passing back anyway, but orig DLR
> bitmask is there in the DLR storage and can have a significant value
> being passed back. So, let's keep it this way.
committed to svn trunk.
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
Kannel Foundation tolj.org system architecture
http://www.kannel.org/ http://www.tolj.org/
mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------