Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox

Currently no way of checking that at runtime, but it would be easy enough
to add logs to show. I will also consider pull requests if you wish to
contribute.

Once it hits the pending number it just waits until there is 'space' and
continues.



On 19 October 2016 at 19:43, José Héctor Galimberti <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I mean, once system its working, there s a way to measure how many pending
> request are there? What will happened with request number 201 it will get
> rejected / retry latter?
>
>
>
>
>
> *De:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *En nombre de *Donald
> Jackson
> *Enviado el:* Miércoles, 19 de Octubre de 2016 05:09 a.m.
>
> *Para:* José Héctor Galimberti
> *CC:* kannel_dev_mailinglist
> *Asunto:* Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
>
>
>
> Sorry I don't understand what you mean
>
> On Wednesday, 19 October 2016, José Héctor Galimberti <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Theres a way to measure this parameter, once in production:
>
>
>
> max-pending-requests=200
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *En nombre de *Donald
> Jackson
> *Enviado el:* Martes, 18 de Octubre de 2016 04:00 p.m.
> *Para:* José Héctor Galimberti
> *CC:* kannel_dev_mailinglist
> *Asunto:* Re: [RFC] New 'box' Kannel Pluginbox
>
>
>
> Hi Jose,
>
>
>
> Please check out https://github.com/donald-jackson/kannel-pluginbox (read
> README carefully)
>
>
>
> 1) If you have an HTTP application that can perform these tasks (routing,
> etc) you can already do this with pluginbox + the HTTP plugin.
>
>
>
> The plugin is written to deal with requests in an asynchronous/callback
> fashion so it should only be limited by the speed of your HTTP application
> in terms of performance.
>
>
>
> Good luck,
>
> Donald
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 18 October 2016 at 23:56, José Héctor Galimberti <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello Donald / Devel list I hope to see this plugin soon on the addon
> repository of kannel.
>
>
>
>
>
> 1) Is this something worthwhile doing, does anyone else have a need for
> this?
>
>
>
> Yes, i think on at least 2 features that I can do in my current
> implementation of kannel
>
>
>
> 1.- Dynamic Prefix routing with database, now kannel only accepts regular
> expressions and that is not enough for all countrys, at least not for Mexico
>
> 2.- All sort of dynamic filtering routing features with database
> configuration without requiring restart or reload of kannel: dynamic SPAM
> filter / priority switching based on string matching / dynamic blacklisting
>
>
>
> 2) Are there any considerations you wish to add at this time?
>
>
>
> Only worried about stability / perfomance
>
>
>
> 3) Are there any features you would like to see added?
>
>
>
>
>
> 4) Would there be any problem including this in the Kannel repository?
>
>
>
> Hope to see it soon there
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Información de ESET Smart Security, versión de la base de datos
> de firmas de virus 14300 (20161018) __________
>
> El mensaje fue verificado por ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset-la.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Donald Jackson
> http://www.ddj.co.za
>
>
>
> __________ Información de ESET Smart Security, versión de la base de datos
> de firmas de virus 14301 (20161018) __________
>
> El mensaje fue verificado por ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset-la.com
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> __________ Información de ESET Smart Security, versión de la base de datos
> de firmas de virus 14306 (20161019) __________
>
> El mensaje fue verificado por ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset-la.com
>



-- 
Donald Jackson
http://www.ddj.co.za