RE: disabling incoming SMS
<[email protected]> Sun, 24 Feb 2019 21:50:51 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel,gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think disabling MO in the AT module is possible if you set sim = buffering to false and specify the proper CNMI string for your modem that disables = MO indications. =3D+=3D Rene -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: users <[email protected]> Namens Stipe Tolj Verzonden: zondag 24 februari 2019 21:06 Aan: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: disabling incoming SMS Am 19.02.19 17:46, schrieb Stuart Kendrick: > I=92m seeing a lot of this in my logs: > > 2019-02-18T19:28:26.526495-08:00 vishnu smsbox[21580]: 2019-02-18 > 19:28:26 [21580] [5] INFO: Starting to service=20 > <#001#006'application/vnd.wap.mms-message> from <1111301000> to <1234> > > 2019-02-18T19:28:44.167763-08:00 vishnu smsbox[21580]: 2019-02-18 > 19:28:44 [21580] [5] INFO: Starting to service <11111301000 Error=20 > Invalid Number. Please re-send using a valid 10 digit mobile number or = > valid short code. No service specified> from <+1121611611> to <1234> > > [=85] > > 2019-02-19T08:38:24.918834-08:00 vishnu smsbox[21580]: 2019-02-19 > 08:38:24 [21580] [5] INFO: Starting to service <11121611611 Error=20 > Invalid Number. Please re-send using a valid 10 digit mobile number or = > valid short code. No service specified> from <+1121611611> to <1234> > > 2019-02-19T08:38:37.474384-08:00 vishnu smsbox[21580]: 2019-02-19 > 08:38:37 [21580] [5] INFO: Starting to service <11121611611 Error=20 > Invalid Number. Please re-send using a valid 10 digit mobile number or = > valid short code. No service specified> from <+1121611611> to <1234> > > I speculate: someone has found my cellular modem number and is sending = > me spam. > > For this application, I transmit SMS over the cellular modem; I = don=92t=20 > want to receive anything. > > * My carrier (AT&T) tells me that they cannot block in-bound SMS = =96 > they can enable bi-directional SMS or disable it: all or = nothing. > * I disabled auto-answer on the modem =85 but this setting appears = to > govern POTS, not SMS > > * Is there a Kannel way (bearerbox or smsbox) to disable incoming > reception of SMS? > * Alternatively, is there a way to instruct Kannel to send = requests > for Invalid Numbers (e.g. =911234=92) to /dev/null? > * Other ideas for dumping these messages? I=92m mostly annoyed by = the > repetitive logging > > At the moment, I have a cronjob job which stops bearerox & smsbox,=20 > sleeps for several minutes (not clear to me why this is necessary),=20 > and then restarts them. This of course creates a dead zone, in terms=20 > of service, which is suboptimal. Hi Stuart, what you can do is to ensure that the "visible" impact is minimal. The = SMSC AT module has no way to "refuse" MOs directly. It will send any MO to = your connected smsbox instance. If you have no application driven MOs that you want to receive, then you = can drop the MOs to nirvana and ensure that there is no response bounced = back to the originator, i.e. via config context group =3D sms-service keyword =3D default text =3D "No action specified" max-messages =3D 0 You WILL still see the MOs in the bearerbox access-log and the smsbox access-log though. It MAY BE an option to think about a config directive for the SMSC AT = module to "turn off" MO interpretation and simply drop anything we get on the modem. @devel: Anyone from the SMSC AT developer folks that wants to pick this = up? -- Best Regards, Stipe Tolj ------------------------------------------------------------------- D=FCsseldorf, NRW, Germany Kannel Foundation tolj.org system architecture http://www.kannel.org/ http://www.tolj.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------